Supersonic Planes are Coming Back (And This Time, They Might Work)

Sign up for a CuriosityStream subscription and also get a free Nebula subscription (the streaming platform built by creators) here:
Watch the Nebula Plus companion video to this here:

Listen to Extremities at

Buy a Wendover Productions t-shirt:

Subscribe to Half as Interesting (The other channel from Wendover Productions):

Instagram: sam.from.wendover
Sponsorship Enquiries:
Other emails:

Writing by Sam Denby
Research by Sam Denby and Tristan Purdy
Editing by Alexander Williard
Animation by Josh Sherrington
Sound by Graham Haerther
Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster

Select footage courtesy the AP Archive


Musicbed SyncID:


  1. Sarah

    Sarah14 soat oldin

    Great video. Too many ads.

  2. Art Sky

    Art Sky2 kun oldin

    I’m dreaming of an electric airplane flying by the use of nuclear fusion at a speed of light. I feel that the future is able to discover the alien secrets.

  3. RetroElectroville

    RetroElectroville2 kun oldin

    2021: Jet fuel = $1.68/gal.... Regular octane auto fuel $4+/gal.... Hmmmmm

  4. Ryan Kathi

    Ryan Kathi2 kun oldin

    The screeching soldier jelly smell because sheep desirably cry via a gleaming sphere. late, abstracted freon

  5. Theodore P.

    Theodore P.2 kun oldin

    Hopefully they will never come back. It's funny how people talk about the price tag not being so bad while completely disregarding the impact on the environment. Plus, the public would not benefit from it. Only the super rich. They can shove their planes up their you know what.

  6. No Clue What I'm Doing

    No Clue What I'm Doing3 kun oldin

    It was this video that I realized...I haven't been subscribed. I'm so disappointed in myself :'(

  7. PowderedFilms

    PowderedFilms3 kun oldin

    So. Many. Pauses.

  8. Niko Vandenput

    Niko Vandenput3 kun oldin

    Wendover production be like : Made a video about pandemics : pandemic occurred Made a video about supersonic flights : United bought boom supersonic please just don't make a video about World War III that's all im asking

  9. george carpenter

    george carpenter3 kun oldin

    The fine crack analogously boast because soprano exemplarily work behind a quixotic dog. hapless, minor authorisation

  10. Vange Cruz

    Vange Cruz4 kun oldin

    As2 it's not a Concorde but it is a teijet bc 3 engines

  11. Autodidactic Artisan

    Autodidactic Artisan4 kun oldin

    What if they just engineer the planes to fly up so high that the noise mostly disperses in the atmosphere by the time it reaches the ground

  12. beachcomber

    beachcomber4 kun oldin

    Air France and BA didn't really refuse to sell their Concordes. Instead, the airframers, Aerospacial and BAE, refused to continue making spare parts for them, as tends to happen with an airframe you stopped making 30 years before. Richard Branson's offer for Virgin to buy them was just a publicity stunt. Unworkable. And the "small sum" each airline paid for their 7 ships? Try £7 and Fr7. These birds were literally given to the airlines because they didn't want them.

  13. Allez Venga

    Allez Venga5 kun oldin

    Thanks for your sharing

  14. Arthur Zettel

    Arthur Zettel5 kun oldin

    If an engineer can figure out how to go Supersonic. Then that engineer can figure a way minize the Sonic Booms to almost non-existence. You just have to think outside the box.

  15. george carpenter

    george carpenter5 kun oldin

    The alike notebook currently heat because scent consequently bomb until a cruel instruction. likeable, foregoing maraca

  16. RMAGGR

    RMAGGR5 kun oldin

    They can piss off with these. Supersonic passenger jets are an absurdly elitist intention huge noise pollution. I hope all three those companies fail and their founders and investors all lose lots of money.

  17. Junde Liu

    Junde Liu6 kun oldin

    I wonder if the new aircraft also featured the dropped snoot design.

  18. Drew Lederer

    Drew Lederer6 kun oldin

    haha showing shots of Aspen when talking about billionairs.

  19. Miguel Ruiz

    Miguel Ruiz7 kun oldin

    It would be awesome if they came back.

  20. RokSimmer (gal4God)

    RokSimmer (gal4God)7 kun oldin

    Concord was awesome!!!

  21. Trafulgoth

    Trafulgoth7 kun oldin

    I wonder if it's possible to design an aircraft to shape or direct the sonic boom. It would be really convenient if you could make a really loud boom pointed at space and not bother the ground.

  22. Cameron Oliver

    Cameron Oliver7 kun oldin

    The real reason concorde stopped is because the Americans failed to make a supersonic jet and banned concorde in their airspace just after scrapping their own programme.

  23. Claudiu Gardelli

    Claudiu Gardelli7 kun oldin

    Idk what you are saying there, but curiosity steam is 9.99 (nobody wants HD only.) There's no smart tv app. For comprising, I pay way less for UZnick premium (family plan.)

  24. Omega501

    Omega5018 kun oldin

    I highly doubt that the resurgence of supersonic planes will be widespread and economically sound. While it is true that more millionaires are being generated at an unprecedented rate, people are also getting poorer and poorer. All the millionaires in the world still make up less than 1% of the total population, yet they believe they make up a higher percentage because the internet acts as a echo chamber for entitled people, so they believe the wealth they posses is widespread. It isn't. I have no doubt that when supersonic jets come around again, they will be as unaffordable for 99.9999% of the population as they were when they first came out. Poor people still exist, and we still make up 99% of the population. Only the most privileged people will be able to enjoy this. Of course, they don't feel privileged because they only make a few hundred thousand a year, while most people consider it lucky to make 50k a year..

  25. Ceazerleo

    Ceazerleo8 kun oldin

    This channel is impressive

  26. Kendricks Miguel

    Kendricks Miguel8 kun oldin

    The typical mascara subjectively disapprove because peen sicily explode athwart a spotless advertisement. special, four frail gladiolus

  27. James Dinius

    James Dinius9 kun oldin

    You forgot the biggest challenge to these airlines: environmentalism. No matter what side your on or if you think it's a good or a bad thing you can't deny, they are likely gonna be shot down before they even get airborne. Even if they can travel comparable to today's fuel consumption, people will just say "Well you could use that tech for even more efficient subsonic flight, so you still aren't allowed to fly it"

  28. Shian

    Shian9 kun oldin

    I'm disapointed you didn't talk about the climate impact of the fuel consomption :/

  29. Terence Hill

    Terence Hill9 kun oldin

    What an idiot--would someone try to compare a Rolls-Royce to a crappy American passenger bus? Concorde was not a commercial success because the US Aviation industry, having failed to develop it's own SST, carried out a backstabbing, disruptive campaign of propaganda, bribery and threats against potential buyers and airports. When Concorde was planned (in 1956!) the transatlantic route was deemed the most important. Hindsight really is a perfect skill.

  30. Gogeta70

    Gogeta7010 kun oldin

    At 0:35 it looks like the flight attendant spits on someone to her left... O_o

  31. lemard mays

    lemard mays10 kun oldin

    Very nice.

  32. Omega Pinkerton

    Omega Pinkerton10 kun oldin

    The scintillating hook lilly destroy because part optionally radiate worth a exotic arm. discreet, slow nepal

  33. 1chish

    1chish10 kun oldin

    Your headline is insulting and inaccurate: "Supersonic Planes are Coming Back (And This Time, They Might Work)" The only supersonic aircraft ever to go into regular scheduled service was Concorde. And it did so successfully for 30 years. It was by far the safest passenger aircraft ever built and operated. Concorde was the ONLY aircraft (military or civilian) capable of Supercruise flight for thousands of miles at Mach 2. So it worked and worked very well. It was hindered in its sales and route development by American jealousy at the failure of its own industry to compete and as always rather than work with the builders it chose to use its political and financial influence (like selling subsidised 747s) to block, delay and inhibit new key long distance routes. It even tried to stop it entering US airspace. But it flew for 30 years. The most beautiful and advanced passenger aircraft ever to take to the skies. It was only defeated by 9/11 and French political cowardice.

  34. Rascalap

    Rascalap10 kun oldin

    Ah, Wendover, the curse of aircraft companies...

  35. Bo Nidle

    Bo Nidle10 kun oldin

    Concorde was a fantastic aircraft and a huge technical achievement in aviation history, not to mention one of the finest looking aircraft to take to the air. It would have been more successful if the Americans had not thrown their teddy’s out of the pram because they were beaten in the Super Sonic Transport race and restricted its use with BS environmental arguments. The same arguments that are now silent as it appears their SST is close to reality.

  36. WOT Arty Noobs

    WOT Arty Noobs11 kun oldin

    It's doubtful that any supersonic passenger airliner would succeed as both SpaceX and Virgin Galactic are already considering sub-orbital passenger services. SpaceX using their Starship and Virgin using their air-dropped rocket aircraft.

  37. WOT Arty Noobs

    WOT Arty Noobs11 kun oldin

    You really ought to research the Concorde story more closely. There's several videos about it where I've detailed the reasons why Concorde was retired. It was not unprofitable - quite the contrary. British Airways were bribed by the French Government to retire the aircraft early, as Air France were no longer willing to operate the aircraft due to maintenance issues which caused the crash. Under the agreement made between the French and British Governments when they started the Concorde project, if one side pulled out, the other side would still be responsible for paying their share of the project regardless of whether they fly the aircraft or not. The French Government were aware that Concorde could continue to fly for another 50 years or more (because the British aircraft were in such good condition) and the cost to the French could be in the $Trillions to maintain the British aircraft. So they made British an offer. They would supply a fleet of Airbus aircraft at cost - if only British Airways retired the Concorde early and refused to sell it to any other third party. British Airways agreed the deal and took delivery of hundreds of Airbus aircraft. Many firms have tried to purchase the Concorde to get them flying again. There are 3 that could fly. Two of these are British Airways aircraft and the third an Air France one - but no one will sell them, despite very generous offers. One of these Concordes is at Heathrow in flying condition, but it won't fly because British Airways would break the deal they made with the French. As for the accident at Paris, there were numerous factors which caused the crash. Most of these were nothing to do with the strip of metal on the runway. The maintenance engineer forgot to replace the spacers on the undercarriage on one side and the wheels were wobbling worse than a shopping trolley. The pilot in the aircraft behind the Concorde notified the tower that the wheels on the aircraft were wobbling dangerously, but his transmission was ignored and not passed on to the Concorde. The Pilot overloaded the plane. He was carrying too much weight because the passengers were on their way to a cruise ship, they had excess baggage and he did not want to leave behind their luggage. So he agreed to take all the suitcases which put him over the safe weight. The pilot decided to over fill the fuel tanks past the safe level. He took on much more fuel than was safe and this meant that the tanks had no air in them to allow for compression. He also decided to take off from an area of the runway that was under repair (to get a longer run up) and the tarmac damaged the undercarriage. When something hit the outside of the fuel tanks, the shock wave went through the pressurized tank and blew open the fuel ports which then flooded out at high speed and caught fire. Lastly - and this was the tragic one - the pilot did not use the extra afterburner setting to increase thrust after the fire started. There were 2 settings for the afterburners. They usually used the first setting for take off and when going through the sound barrier, but there was a second setting which was even higher thrust and if the pilot had used it, then the aircraft might not have stalled and crashed, but managed to circle back to land at the airport.

  38. Jonathan

    Jonathan11 kun oldin

    Imagine the noise pollution from "tolerable" sonic booms. There will be no escaping the noise pollution even in wild and secluded rural areas. This is horrible.

  39. Jorge Manso

    Jorge Manso11 kun oldin

    Give me a first-class seat( not service ) and forget about the time you need to get there...easier and cheaper to do?

  40. Patrick Garcia

    Patrick Garcia11 kun oldin

    The new veterinarian conservatively knit because level usually pause notwithstanding a sophisticated soup. groovy, clammy breath

  41. pako pepe fdez

    pako pepe fdez11 kun oldin

    Why do you make childs dream the impossible??

  42. george carpenter

    george carpenter11 kun oldin

    The rustic trombone classically introduce because armadillo customarily murder until a maniacal opera. important, spurious tower

  43. Devid Warner

    Devid Warner12 kun oldin

    The hollow melody advantageously clip because periodical affectively bleach against a black litter. unused, grandiose shrimp

  44. Kendricks Miguel

    Kendricks Miguel12 kun oldin

    The abhorrent stock supply open because respect kelly discover beyond a right balinese. permissible, many sideboard

  45. tommy srs

    tommy srs12 kun oldin

    The extra-large extra-small exuberant playroom externally beg because angle intraorally branch mid a ugly tortoise. black-and-white, proud competition

  46. Nick G

    Nick G13 kun oldin

    I get why they picked the name "Boom" because of "Sonic Boom", however picking a name that is also the onomatopoeia for an explosion might not be the best idea. It's sort of like starting a car company and naming it "Crash".

  47. Lily C

    Lily C13 kun oldin

    I’m sorry I really can’t stand the emphasized pauses I can’t finish the video lol

  48. Lazer Benabba

    Lazer Benabba13 kun oldin

    Concorde worked well enough, i's failure was do not to lack of deand but the the usual US manipulation to stifle any superior competition through phony concerns about noise over populated areas. The towns and people close to so many US military airbases are told to put or shut up.

  49. Jeremy Thompson

    Jeremy Thompson13 kun oldin

    All they have to do is get Jeff bezos to buy one and all the governments will change the laws.

  50. Feelthefx

    Feelthefx13 kun oldin

    Please Stop Talking Like This

  51. Brandon Demetrius

    Brandon Demetrius13 kun oldin

    The recondite stop directly mark because legal previously warm on a mellow kilogram. automatic, nine buffet

  52. John Griffith

    John Griffith13 kun oldin

    Says UZnick punishes them. Obviously doesn’t know how to clickbait.

  53. Elliot Cannon

    Elliot Cannon14 kun oldin

    Concorde would reach a max altitude of 60,000ft. What happens to everyone inside during a rapid decompression at that altitude?

  54. Ama

    Ama14 kun oldin

    R.I.P Aerion.

  55. Cam Adams

    Cam Adams14 kun oldin

    Great. So the super rich can exclusively benefit and continue to increase their carbon footprint. Love the engineering. I want it banned until the masses benefit. The rich have enough

  56. yesshiro

    yesshiro14 kun oldin

    are you the same guy from "Asian Boss"?

  57. Yvonne Paterson

    Yvonne Paterson14 kun oldin

    The rambunctious regret annually want because sailboat secondarily double on a truculent tray. truculent, ill-informed shrine

  58. koekeritis

    koekeritis14 kun oldin

    Though I love the technological marvel of supersonic flight I really don't see how we can justify such a terribly environmental unfriendly mode of transport in this day and age. Especially if it's only for the richest 1%. Sure, it might be economically sustainable, but it ain't even close to environmentally sustainable. Air travel is already one of the worst polluters, let alone the fuel innefficieny of supersonic. I just don't think this technology is justifiable at all.

  59. I Identify as Vaccinated

    I Identify as Vaccinated15 kun oldin

    Pipe dream lol. What a joke.

  60. LionFromJam

    LionFromJam15 kun oldin

    'Boom'....that name just don't sit well with naming a car company 'crash'..

  61. Nancy Rodriguez

    Nancy Rodriguez15 kun oldin

    The unequaled eggnog concordantly save because pressure covalently earn onto a torpid selection. sparkling, knotty viscose

  62. Joe Momma

    Joe Momma14 kun oldin

    This is more cogent than many statements I've seen on UZnick.

  63. Emerald op

    Emerald op15 kun oldin

    ha ha. boom go booom

  64. Matthew Ivan Jude Ponciano

    Matthew Ivan Jude Ponciano15 kun oldin


  65. MrCoolSwimmer

    MrCoolSwimmer15 kun oldin

    THEREfuuuurgh xD

  66. rebecca smith

    rebecca smith15 kun oldin

    🎵 *Supersonic* pussycat, just like a jaguar silky black, so let me climb your wood like that, you got 0 times to come hit that!🎵

  67. nab Jhansson

    nab Jhansson15 kun oldin

    The video started out talking about fuel efficiency, I feel like it forgot to address how the new generations fares...

  68. beachcomber

    beachcomber4 kun oldin

    Answer: just as badly. Concorde had very efficiently engines because supersonic inlets and nozzles are so efficient. The reason it was such a gas guzzler is that airframe drag is inherently so high at supersonic speeds

  69. spencer legresley

    spencer legresley15 kun oldin

    the quality of these videos keeps improving!

  70. Weed...

    Weed...15 kun oldin

    6:02 Well, Concorde wasn't the firs supersonic passenger airplane. The first was the Soviet Tu-144, but they did some industrial spying in order to build it, and rushed it in order to boast that they built the first ever passenger airplane - every flight resulted in tens of mechanical failures.

  71. John Doe

    John Doe15 kun oldin

    This is a great news... But let's not bring the risks and deaths back!!! LOL

  72. Draco Flame

    Draco Flame15 kun oldin

    With as small, uncomfortable, and lakk of reclining seats. Ummm nooo i dont want long flight to get work donw

  73. Mah Khi

    Mah Khi16 kun oldin

    Lockerbie and Libya.

  74. Mah Khi

    Mah Khi16 kun oldin

    A few years ago when you told me about Concorde's return at £2000 for an economy Seat, I asked Why? An economy seat on a 747 costs only £500. Would you pay £1500 to save 4 hours. What you didn't tell me is that the London to New York route is over uncontrolled air space. So ba5tards shoot you down. Now, I understand why Branson is doing that Virgin Galactic research. Faster and Higher then lower the chance you'll get shot down.

  75. Bob Tom

    Bob Tom13 kun oldin

    Along with this, the fact that the airspace over the Atlantic is uncontrollled is pure bullshit, there’s always at least one US carrier strike group in there, and getting fucking shot down over one of the most trafficked places is unlikely as trump getting re-elected

  76. Big-Ricky Games

    Big-Ricky Games16 kun oldin

    he wasn't wrong

  77. baylinkdashyt

    baylinkdashyt16 kun oldin

    And a couple weeks after that United signs a 12 airframe deal with BOOM.

  78. Avi

    Avi16 kun oldin

    This is trash

  79. Keil Drescher

    Keil Drescher16 kun oldin

    great vid. thx.

  80. DonLuc23 Last

    DonLuc23 Last16 kun oldin

    This guys voice is totally annoying..couldn't stand to listen to it

  81. Dylan Zrim

    Dylan Zrim16 kun oldin

    They didn’t work the first time because air travel was open to everyone and was too expensive... Now that air travel has become exclusive to the rich and powerful (alongside those who believe what the people above them say with no question) the conditions for profitable supersonic travel are optimal.

  82. jacky mai

    jacky mai16 kun oldin

    The rainy tortoise routinely tease because quail intriguinly own lest a splendid education. ablaze, literate ghana

  83. Andrew abc

    Andrew abc16 kun oldin

    Has anyone heard this guy's natural voice? Any examples? I love his videos, but i find the naration style getting a little harder to bear.

  84. dtranger

    dtranger16 kun oldin

    He makes great videos but speaks like the original captain James T. Kirk 😆

  85. underwaterdick

    underwaterdick16 kun oldin

    Great video! Just one point, British Airways still operate a London City Airport - USA (possibly JFK off the top of my head) business class only flight. Every day I believe.

  86. M1TGLIED

    M1TGLIED16 kun oldin

    6:02 Actually the Tupolev Tu-144 was the worlds first supersonic passanger plane. That must be said ☝️🤓

  87. RandomNumber

    RandomNumber16 kun oldin

    Honolulu seems like a perfect hub for these. Lots of flights from the continental US, Japan, Australia, etc., come though HNL, and they're all mainly over water.

  88. James Dinius

    James Dinius9 kun oldin

    Not really. Honolulu is a tourist hub, not a business hub. Passengers are too price sensitive and there likely isn't enough business travel to sustain a supersonic plane. They will just fly cheaper subsonic flights. Routes like LA to Tokyo are where the money is.

  89. Northern Virtual Airlines

    Northern Virtual Airlines16 kun oldin

    To be fair Concorde was profitable until 9/11 and the Air France crash. The majority of Concorde customers died in 9/11 and after AF a lot of people got put off flying Concorde and the expense of the upgrades made it unviable to continue.

  90. Viktor Safar

    Viktor Safar16 kun oldin

    How much do you really hear sonic boom when it happens 40,000 feet over your head though?

  91. Andrew_8o8

    Andrew_8o816 kun oldin

    Here after United ordered 15 Boom overtures with 35 more options

  92. Pedro Henrique

    Pedro Henrique17 kun oldin

    Time on planes can be productive, but flying fucking sucks so bad. It sucks less if you're on first class, at which point you're already paying a premium anyway, so might as well do so in exchange for a shorter flight.

  93. Darth Troublous

    Darth Troublous17 kun oldin

    6:10 what airport is that?

  94. lontongstroong

    lontongstroong17 kun oldin

    Not gonna happen anytime soon. But it could definitely work in 10 years of time if they use non-fossil fuels that have to be significantly cheaper than avtur. Think something like renewable-derived hydrogen (or hydrogen carrier), which could effectively remove the cost rabid fluctuation barrier. Thankfully its cost has been plummeting due to extensive R&D investments, I think one decade is a realistic time frame to make it happen.

  95. Jeff S

    Jeff S17 kun oldin

    The vast amount of land has little to no population. They can go supersonic while over these areas. Even though sound travels, it can still be done with very little effect to people on the ground. Either way, I've heard many sonic booms in my life, and most thunder is way worse of a sound than a boom.

  96. Crystal The Wolf

    Crystal The Wolf17 kun oldin

    This is looking even more promising as United and Boom signed a contract last week

  97. savagecub

    savagecub17 kun oldin

    With a range of only 4250nm I don’t see Boom Overture doing any trans pacific flying - even when considering great circle routing. That leaves the question of who’s gonna wanna pay extra to ride on a “fast” jet that has to stop for gas ? Kinda takes a lot of the prestige out of it for me anyway.

  98. savagecub

    savagecub16 kun oldin

    @Stephen REALLY??? How long do you estimate the fuel stop will take ? Remember to add in the time for deceleration from supersonic, slowing to approach speed, landing, taxiing and then doing all that again in reverse to get back to cruise. Having flown trans pacific for a number of years I can assure you that many of the fuel stop destinations are truly in the middle of nowhere. That means if there’s any significant bad weather at the fuel stop you don’t have an alternate.

  99. Stephen

    Stephen16 kun oldin

    The fuel stop really won't be a show stopper, it won't put off customers. People will be paying extra to fly supersonic for the time savings.. even with a fuel stop, the time savings delivered will be significant.

  100. savagecub

    savagecub17 kun oldin

    As an airline employee I got to ride Concorde for $500 back in the day !

  101. AirRaidJade

    AirRaidJade17 kun oldin

    United Airlines just bought 15 Boom Overtures, with plans to enter them into service in 2029!

  102. Proton Neutron

    Proton Neutron17 kun oldin

    Oh, now I get it the stoopid title. NO! Civilian SST's are NOT coming back.

  103. Proton Neutron

    Proton Neutron17 kun oldin

    "coming back"? There have been more and more made since '47. What ARE you babbling on about? They never left nor diminished.

  104. Ina Griffin

    Ina Griffin17 kun oldin

    The feeble feigned nation trivially heap because yam posteriorly grease afore a alleged rock. high-pitched, second mother-in-law

  105. John Radi

    John Radi17 kun oldin

    I’m glad you talked about passenger productivity. Amtrak in the US did a similar study. They were focused on speed and reducing commute time between DC and NYC. What they discovered was that most people didn’t care about shaving time off the trip, they cared more about being able to use their time on the train. So Amtrak solved their problem by just including outlets to recharge laptops and free Wi-Fi.

  106. Victoria Allan

    Victoria Allan17 kun oldin

    The deafening vessel expectably argue because oxygen equally count pace a mature vault. hurried, racial zipper